Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: GOOGL stock price vs FTNT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FTNT's multiple
Needs FTNT P/E.
Implied fair value · at GOOGL's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Alphabet Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$101.71
Base
$124.15
Bull
$141.60
FORTINET, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MICROSOFT CORP
GOOGL vs MSFT
AMAZON COM INC
GOOGL vs AMZN
Meta Platforms, Inc.
GOOGL vs META
Apple Inc.
GOOGL vs AAPL
NVIDIA CORP
GOOGL vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
GOOGL vs CSCO
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
GOOGL vs CRWD
Palo Alto Networks Inc
GOOGL vs PANW
Zscaler, Inc.
GOOGL vs ZS
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe GOOGL can sustain its current growth and margin profile without a major re-rating compression, then GOOGL looks attractive versus FTNT because it is cheaper on every listed valuation multiple while posting stronger profitability and returns.
GOOGL trades at a meaningfully cheaper multiple than FTNT on every listed valuation metric, while the model implies material upside from current price to FTNT-based value. The gap is driven by GOOGL’s much lower P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue despite larger scale and stronger returns.
Supporting Metrics
