Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AMZN stock price vs ROST: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ROST's multiple
Needs ROST P/E.
Implied fair value · at AMZN's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AMAZON.COM, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Ross Stores, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Walmart Inc.
AMZN vs WMT
EBAY INC
AMZN vs EBAY
MICROSOFT CORP
AMZN vs MSFT
Alphabet Inc.
AMZN vs GOOGL
Apple Inc.
AMZN vs AAPL
TARGET CORP
AMZN vs TGT
TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/
AMZN vs TJX
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
AMZN vs WBA
NORDSTROM INC
AMZN vs JWN
Macy's, Inc.
AMZN vs M
DILLARD'S, INC.
AMZN vs DDS
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AMZN can sustain double-digit revenue growth and keep converting scale into operating profit, then the current setup supports a hold-to-mildly constructive stance because AMZN is only 1.1% below the implied P/E value and has better growth and EBITDA margin than ROST.
AMZN's current price of $271.88 is only 1.1% below the implied P/E value of $274.76, so the stock screens as fairly valued on this framework. The gap is small, and the broader valuation picture is mixed because AMZN trades at a lower P/E than ROST but a richer P/S and similar EV-based multiples.
Supporting Metrics
