Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AMZN stock price vs CSCO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CSCO's multiple
Needs CSCO P/E.
Implied fair value · at AMZN's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AMAZON.COM, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$32.30
Base
$38.62
Bull
$46.85
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Walmart Inc.
AMZN vs WMT
EBAY INC
AMZN vs EBAY
MICROSOFT CORP
AMZN vs MSFT
Alphabet Inc.
AMZN vs GOOGL
Apple Inc.
AMZN vs AAPL
TARGET CORP
AMZN vs TGT
CIENA CORP
AMZN vs CIEN
Palo Alto Networks Inc
AMZN vs PANW
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
AMZN vs JNPR
Fortinet, Inc.
AMZN vs FTNT
Arista Networks, Inc.
AMZN vs ANET
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
AMZN vs LDOS
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AMZN can sustain faster revenue growth and ROIC than CSCO while keeping leverage low, then AMZN looks attractive to own on a relative valuation basis because it trades at lower P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue multiples despite the upside to $326.14.
AMZN’s implied price of $326.14 is 20.1% above the current $271.58, suggesting upside if CSCO-based multiple is sustained. The valuation case is supported by AMZN trading at lower multiples than CSCO across key metrics, especially P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue.
Supporting Metrics
