Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AMZN stock price vs CNC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CNC's multiple
Needs CNC P/E.
Implied fair value · at AMZN's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AMAZON.COM, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
CENTENE CORPORATION · implied price per share
Bear
$118.61
Base
$138.46
Bull
$164.32
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Walmart Inc.
AMZN vs WMT
EBAY INC
AMZN vs EBAY
MICROSOFT CORP
AMZN vs MSFT
Alphabet Inc.
AMZN vs GOOGL
Apple Inc.
AMZN vs AAPL
TARGET CORP
AMZN vs TGT
MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC.
AMZN vs MOH
HUMANA INC
AMZN vs HUM
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC
AMZN vs UNH
Oscar Health, Inc.
AMZN vs OSCR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CNC P/S comparison is the correct anchor for AMZN despite its much stronger profitability and returns, then avoid or trim the position because the stated valuation implies severe downside versus the current price.
The valuation gap is extreme: AMZN’s current price of $271.58 versus an implied $10.54 suggests -96.1% downside on the stated P/S basis. That discount is driven by CNC’s much lower sales multiple and weaker profitability, but it is not a like-for-like benchmark given AMZN’s far superior margin and return profile.
Supporting Metrics
