Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: XOM stock price vs HAL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at HAL's multiple
Needs HAL P/E.
Implied fair value · at XOM's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, XOM P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Exxon Mobil Corporation · implied price per share
A valid share-count denominator is required for the selected valuation policy.
HALLIBURTON COMPANY · implied price per share
Bear
$18.18
Base
$22.41
Bull
$27.92
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Chevron Corporation
XOM vs CVX
ConocoPhillips
XOM vs COP
Marathon Petroleum Corp
XOM vs MPC
Phillips 66
XOM vs PSX
VALERO ENERGY CORP/TX
XOM vs VLO
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORP /DE/
XOM vs OXY
SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED/NV
XOM vs SLB
NOV Inc.
XOM vs NOV
TechnipFMC plc
XOM vs FTI
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
XOM vs HP
ONEOK INC /NEW/
XOM vs OKE
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe XOM can maintain its stronger margins and conservative leverage despite negative revenue growth, then holding or accumulating on weakness makes sense because XOM’s balance sheet is much stronger than HAL’s and its profitability is superior on several margin metrics, even though valuation still looks richer on P/E and P/S.
On a P/E basis, XOM trades at 23.2x versus HAL at 19.8x, suggesting XOM is priced at a premium to its HAL. However, on EV/EBITDA XOM is slightly cheaper at 16.4x versus HAL at 16.9x, so the valuation gap is not consistent across methods.
Supporting Metrics
