Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AAPL stock price vs NFLX: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NFLX's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, NFLX P/E.
Implied fair value · at AAPL's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, AAPL P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2024
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Apple Inc. · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
NETFLIX INC · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
AAPL · not enough data.
NFLX · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MICROSOFT CORP
AAPL vs MSFT
Alphabet Inc.
AAPL vs GOOGL
Meta Platforms, Inc.
AAPL vs META
NVIDIA CORP
AAPL vs NVDA
INTEL CORP
AAPL vs INTC
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
AAPL vs CSCO
AMAZON COM INC
AAPL vs AMZN
COMCAST CORP
AAPL vs CMCSA
Walt Disney Co
AAPL vs DIS
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
AAPL vs WBD
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
AAPL vs LYV
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AAPL's superior profitability and quality deserve a premium but not the extreme 802.7% upside implied by the stated P/E output, then treat the stock as fundamentally strong but not mispriced enough to justify that valuation gap because AAPL already trades far below NFLX's P/E and near the top of its historical range.
The valuation gap is extreme: the stated P/E implied price of $2,628.16 versus AAPL's current price of $291.13 implies 802.7% upside, but that result appears inconsistent with NFLX data because AAPL already trades at 36.4x P/E versus NFLX at 352.3x. On a relative basis, AAPL is cheaper on earnings while still showing stronger profitability, which argues against paying a much higher implied multiple for AAPL than NFLX.
Supporting Metrics
