Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · View financials
Decision snapshot: KO stock price vs WEN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WEN's multiple
Needs WEN P/E.
Implied fair value · at KO's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
COCA COLA CO · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Wendy's Co · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
PEPSICO INC
KO vs PEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
KO vs KDP
Monster Beverage Corp
KO vs MNST
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP
KO vs FIZZ
MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO
KO vs TAP
HERSHEY CO
KO vs HSY
MCDONALDS CORP
KO vs MCD
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC
KO vs CMG
Shake Shack Inc.
KO vs SHAK
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
KO vs DRI
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
KO vs DPZ
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe KO can sustain its superior margins and modest growth despite a rich multiple, then hold rather than add aggressively because the stock already trades above WEN-implied and DCF ranges; if you prioritize relative valuation alone, the data argues against initiating new capital at the current price.
KO trades at $86.86 versus a WEN-implied value of $26.93, implying -69.0% downside on the P/E-based comparison. The premium is supported by KO’s much stronger margins and growth, but the stock still sits above the top of the historical band and DCF range provided.
Supporting Metrics
