Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: KO stock price vs DRI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at DRI's multiple
Needs DRI P/E.
Implied fair value · at KO's multiple
Needs KO P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
COCA COLA CO · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
PEPSICO INC
KO vs PEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
KO vs KDP
Monster Beverage Corp
KO vs MNST
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP
KO vs FIZZ
MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO
KO vs TAP
HERSHEY CO
KO vs HSY
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC
KO vs EAT
CHEESECAKE FACTORY INC
KO vs CAKE
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
KO vs TXRH
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
KO vs DPZ
McDonald's Corporation
KO vs MCD
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe KO deserves a persistent premium multiple because of its superior margins and stability, then hold or accumulate on weakness; if you expect valuation to track closer to DRI’s lower P/E and KO’s slow growth persists, then reduce exposure because the P/E model implies 14.5% downside.
KO trades at 26.1x P/E versus DRI at 22.4x, which is a premium despite KO’s slower revenue growth. The implied price of $67.98 is 14.5% below the current price of $79.48, while the current price also sits above the historical band midpoint and far above the DCF range.
Supporting Metrics
