Amazon.Com, Inc.
6.59xPrice / tangible book
Market cap
$2.50T
Tangible equity (USD)
$378.60B
Price / tangible book
6.59x
Price / book
6.07x
Net income / ending equity
18.9%
Net income / ending assets
9.5%
Efficiency ratio
—
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AMZN stock price vs DFS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at DFS's multiple
Needs DFS P/E.
Implied fair value · at AMZN's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Filter, sort, and scan the equity metrics that matter most for banks: book value, tangible book, returns, and operating efficiency.
Lower is better
Lower is better
Profitability lag
Asset efficiency edge
Lower is better
Statements
Reported bank earnings and balances, with each company’s reporting period shown.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
Tangible book and profitability anchor a bank, not enterprise value.
Deposits and cash-like balances distort enterprise value for banks, so this section reads equity value, tangible book and profitability instead.
Price / tangible book
Market cap
$2.50T
Tangible equity (USD)
$378.60B
Price / tangible book
6.59x
Price / book
6.07x
Net income / ending equity
18.9%
Net income / ending assets
9.5%
Efficiency ratio
—
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
—
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
25.3%
Net income / ending assets
3.1%
Efficiency ratio
247.6%
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AMAZON.COM, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES · implied price per share
Bank model off — standard DCF modelling is disabled for financial institutions.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider banking comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Walmart Inc.
AMZN vs WMT
EBAY INC
AMZN vs EBAY
MICROSOFT CORP
AMZN vs MSFT
Alphabet Inc.
AMZN vs GOOGL
Apple Inc.
AMZN vs AAPL
TARGET CORP
AMZN vs TGT
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP
AMZN vs COF
American Express Company
AMZN vs AXP
Visa Inc.
AMZN vs V
Mastercard Incorporated
AMZN vs MA
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AMZN can sustain 12%+ revenue growth and keep ROIC around 22.2% despite its 32.2x P/E, then holding or accumulating makes sense because the market is already pricing in strong execution; if you want a valuation margin of safety, the DCF range suggests caution at $271.58.
AMZN's current price of $271.58 sits above its historical band midpoint and materially above the top of the indicated historical range, while the DCF range implies a much lower intrinsic value than the market price. The absence of a P/E-based implied price and the lack of comparable valuation multiples for DFS limit the precision of the relative valuation call.
Supporting Metrics