Apple Inc. (AAPL) vs. CORNING INC /NY (GLW) Stock Comparison & Valuation | Edwyn

Edwyn

Edwyn Search companies, tickers, CIKs…⌘K

Apple Inc. (AAPL) vs. CORNING INC /NY (GLW) Stock Comparison & Valuation | Edwyn

Updated 2026-08-02 01:08 UTC

This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.

AAPL screens as fundamentally stronger than GLW and trades at a lower P/E, but the valuation picture is mixed because GLW is cheaper on sales and faster growing, while DCF and historical ranges suggest AAPL may be below intrinsic value despite GLW-based model implying meaningful upside.

Actionable Takeaway

If you believe AAPL's superior profitability and capital efficiency deserve a premium valuation despite slower growth, then buying or holding AAPL is justified because its margins, ROIC, and quality scores are much stronger than GLW's, even though GLW-based upside is the only model showing large rerating potential.

On a GLW P/E basis, AAPL appears undervalued versus the implied price of $563.58, which is 82.4% above the current price of $308.91. However, the comparison is not uniform: AAPL trades at 36.4x P/E versus GLW at 75.5x, yet AAPL is more expensive on P/S and both the DCF range and historical band point well below GLW-implied valuation.

Supporting Metrics

Key Risks

AAPL's valuation is inconsistent across methods, with the current price above the historical band ($244.67-$299.05) and far above the DCF range ($73.18-$99.01).
GLW's faster revenue growth of 19.1% vs AAPL's 6.4% could support a relatively higher multiple than the market currently assigns AAPL on some metrics.
AAPL's leverage is higher on a debt/equity basis at 1.4x versus GLW's 0.7x, which could matter if growth or margins weaken.