Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · View financials
Decision snapshot: AAPL stock price vs CHKP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CHKP's multiple
Needs CHKP P/E.
Implied fair value · at AAPL's multiple
Needs Annual EPS.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Capital structure 98% equity / 2% debt · EV / Revenue 8.34x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 23.29x
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Apple Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$130.85
Base
$159.76
Bull
$182.30
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. · implied price per share
The ordinary-share to listed-security ratio could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MICROSOFT CORP
AAPL vs MSFT
Alphabet Inc.
AAPL vs GOOGL
Meta Platforms, Inc.
AAPL vs META
NVIDIA CORP
AAPL vs NVDA
INTEL CORP
AAPL vs INTC
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
AAPL vs CSCO
Palo Alto Networks Inc
AAPL vs PANW
Fortinet, Inc.
AAPL vs FTNT
Zscaler, Inc.
AAPL vs ZS
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
AAPL vs CRWD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AAPL deserves a persistent premium multiple despite only matching CHKP's growth, then you can justify holding the name; otherwise, the data favors trimming or avoiding new purchases because AAPL trades at far richer valuation multiples while the current price sits above both the historical band and the DCF range.
AAPL trades at a sharp premium to CHKP across P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, while the implied price from the P/E comparison is far below the current price. The gap is driven by AAPL's much higher absolute valuation multiples rather than a meaningful growth advantage, since revenue growth is nearly identical.
Supporting Metrics
