Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: KO stock price vs STZ: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at STZ's multiple
Needs STZ P/E.
Implied fair value · at KO's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, KO P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
COCA COLA CO · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. · implied price per share
A valid share-count denominator is required for the selected valuation policy.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe KO can keep defending premium margins and modest growth while maintaining its lower net leverage, then holding KO is reasonable because its profitability and balance-sheet quality are stronger than STZ’s, even though valuation appears rich versus both earnings and DCF anchors.
KO trades at 28.6x P/E and 7.8x P/S, which is a premium profile for a mature beverage name, but STZ comparison is incomplete because STZ has no listed valuation multiples. KO is also above its DCF range of $31.37-$42.44 and sits near the upper end of its historical band, suggesting the market already prices in quality and stability.
Supporting Metrics
