NETGEAR, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$209.90M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NTGR stock price vs QCOM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at QCOM's multiple
Needs QCOM P/S.
Implied fair value · at NTGR's multiple
Needs NTGR P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
NETGEAR, Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
QUALCOMM INC/DE · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NTGR vs CSCO
EXTREME NETWORKS INC
NTGR vs EXTR
CIENA CORP
NTGR vs CIEN
Match Group, Inc.
NTGR vs MTCH
VERISIGN INC/CA
NTGR vs VRSN
Apple Inc.
NTGR vs AAPL
Broadcom Inc.
NTGR vs AVGO
INTEL CORP
NTGR vs INTC
NVIDIA CORP
NTGR vs NVDA
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
NTGR vs TXN
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
NTGR vs AMD
Qorvo, Inc.
NTGR vs QRVO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NTGR can sustain revenue growth while restoring positive operating margins and reducing leverage, then NTGR may offer upside from the current low sales multiple because the market is already discounting weak quality and profitability.
NTGR’s current price of $25.20 is far below the P/S-implied value of $128.99, implying 411.9% upside on that framework. However, the valuation gap is largely driven by QCOM’s much higher revenue scale, growth, and margin profile, making the comparison directionally useful but not a clean like-for-like comp.
Supporting Metrics