NETGEAR, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$209.90M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NTGR stock price vs VRSN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at VRSN's multiple
Needs VRSN P/S.
Implied fair value · at NTGR's multiple
Needs NTGR P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
NETGEAR, Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
VERISIGN INC/CA · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NTGR vs CSCO
EXTREME NETWORKS INC
NTGR vs EXTR
CIENA CORP
NTGR vs CIEN
Match Group, Inc.
NTGR vs MTCH
Apple Inc.
NTGR vs AAPL
MICROSOFT CORP
NTGR vs MSFT
AMAZON COM INC
NTGR vs AMZN
Alphabet Inc.
NTGR vs GOOGL
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
NTGR vs CRWD
NetApp, Inc.
NTGR vs NTAP
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NTGR can materially improve margins and reduce leverage toward a more stable earnings profile, then hold or selectively accumulate because the stock is priced far below VRSN on revenue multiples; otherwise, the current discount looks justified by weak profitability and elevated distress risk.
NTGR trades at 0.9x P/S versus VRSN at 15.9x P/S, implying an extremely large valuation gap on a revenue basis. The provided implied price of $396.82 suggests huge upside, but that estimate is not credible in a straight VRSN comparison because VRSN’s premium reflects fundamentally superior margins and earnings power.
Supporting Metrics