Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: NFLX stock price vs FUN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FUN's multiple
Needs FUN P/E.
Implied fair value · at NFLX's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
13 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Netflix, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
NFLX vs AAPL
AMAZON COM INC
NFLX vs AMZN
COMCAST CORP
NFLX vs CMCSA
Walt Disney Co
NFLX vs DIS
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
NFLX vs WBD
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
NFLX vs LYV
VAIL RESORTS INC
NFLX vs MTN
Planet Fitness, Inc.
NFLX vs PLNT
iHeartMedia, Inc.
NFLX vs IHRT
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.
NFLX vs MSGS
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NFLX can sustain its 15.9% revenue growth while preserving its 29.5% operating margin and 41.6% ROIC, then FUN-based downside case looks unreliable and NFLX remains attractive because it is much higher quality than FUN despite the model's large discount.
The model implies NFLX should be valued at $6.18 versus its current $73.33 price, which is a -91.6% downside under FUN-based P/S framework. That extreme gap is driven by the fact that FUN trades at a much lower P/S multiple, but FUN's weak profitability and leverage make it a poor anchor for valuing NFLX.
Supporting Metrics
