Charter Communications, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$477.00M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt capMarket cap $236.37B · View financials
Decision snapshot: CHTR stock price vs TXN: inconclusive — current versus $1.72K implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TXN's multiple
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Needs CHTR P/E.
Snapshot Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 94% equity / 6% debt · EV / Revenue 13.98x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED · implied price per share
Bear
$24.46
Base
$29.37
Bull
$38.11
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COMCAST CORP
CHTR vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
CHTR vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
CHTR vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
CHTR vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
CHTR vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
CHTR vs CLFD
Intel Corporation
CHTR vs INTC
QUALCOMM Incorporated
CHTR vs QCOM
NVIDIA Corporation
CHTR vs NVDA
Broadcom Inc.
CHTR vs AVGO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CHTR can sustain earnings and de-lever while closing the margin and growth gap versus TXN, then a long position in CHTR is defensible because its valuation multiples are far lower; otherwise, TXN’s superior fundamentals suggest the discount may be justified.
CHTR trades at a dramatic valuation discount to TXN on both earnings and sales-based multiples, which mathematically drives the very large implied upside shown here. However, that gap is not purely a mispricing signal because TXN also carries meaningfully stronger profitability, growth, and capital efficiency.
Supporting Metrics