Charter Communications, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$477.00M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CHTR stock price vs AVGO: inconclusive — current versus $1.76K implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AVGO's multiple
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Needs CHTR P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2024
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Broadcom Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COMCAST CORP
CHTR vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
CHTR vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
CHTR vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
CHTR vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
CHTR vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
CHTR vs CLFD
NVIDIA Corporation
CHTR vs NVDA
Intel Corporation
CHTR vs INTC
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
CHTR vs AMD
QUALCOMM Incorporated
CHTR vs QCOM
Cisco Systems, Inc.
CHTR vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CHTR can reaccelerate growth and sustain current profitability while managing leverage, then the stock looks attractive on relative valuation because it trades at 3.5x P/E and 0.6x P/S versus AVGO's much higher multiples; otherwise, the cheapness likely reflects a justified structural discount.
CHTR trades at 3.5x P/E and 0.6x P/S versus AVGO at 48.6x P/E and 28.8x P/S, so the headline valuation gap is extreme. However, the market is paying up for AVGO's much faster growth and stronger profitability, while CHTR's lower multiple reflects a more leveraged, lower-growth profile.
Supporting Metrics