Charter Communications, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$477.00M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt capMarket cap $185.72B
Decision snapshot: CHTR stock price at discount vs QCOM $140.56 current versus $1.28K implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at QCOM's multiple
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Snapshot Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Lower P/E
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 93% equity / 7% debt · EV / Revenue 4.40x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 13.97x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
QUALCOMM INC/DE · implied price per share
Bear
$150.35
Base
$182.35
Bull
$226.48
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COMCAST CORP
CHTR vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
CHTR vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
CHTR vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
CHTR vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
CHTR vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
CHTR vs CLFD
Broadcom Inc.
CHTR vs AVGO
INTEL CORP
CHTR vs INTC
NVIDIA CORP
CHTR vs NVDA
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
CHTR vs TXN
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
CHTR vs AMD
Qorvo, Inc.
CHTR vs QRVO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CHTR can sustain its current margins while materially reducing leverage and stabilizing growth, then the stock may deserve a higher multiple, but based on the current data the safer stance is to avoid extrapolating the P/E gap to QCOM because CHTR’s weaker growth, lower ROIC, and higher debt justify a discount.
CHTR trades at 4.0x P/E versus QCOM at 29.5x, yet CHTR also has weaker growth and much higher leverage, which helps explain part of the gap. On cash-flow-based and asset-value multiples, CHTR is still cheaper than QCOM, but the discount is not unusual given the lower-quality profile.
Supporting Metrics