Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CHTR stock price vs CLFD: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CLFD's multiple
Needs CLFD P/E.
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, CHTR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
CLEARFIELD, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COMCAST CORP
CHTR vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
CHTR vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
CHTR vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
CHTR vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
CHTR vs VZ
CORNING INC /NY
CHTR vs GLW
CIENA CORP
CHTR vs CIEN
CommScope Holding Company, Inc.
CHTR vs COMM
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
CHTR vs CSCO
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
CHTR vs JNPR
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CHTR can sustain its strong margins and manage leverage without a material deterioration in cash generation, then the stock merits accumulation on weakness because it trades far below both the DCF range and the P/S-implied value.
On a P/S basis, CHTR at 0.8x looks far cheaper than CLFD at 2.4x, which drives the very large implied upside to $977.57 versus the current $157.44. However, CLFD implied value of $487.67 is much lower than the DCF range, suggesting the market is likely penalizing CHTR for leverage and slower growth rather than just applying a simple revenue multiple.
Supporting Metrics
