Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SWK stock price vs UL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at UL's multiple
Needs UL P/E.
Implied fair value · at SWK's multiple
Needs SWK P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
14 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
USD conversion input: 1 EUR = 1.116500 USD. FX date unavailable.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
UNILEVER PLC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
SMITH A O CORP
SWK vs AOS
WHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/
SWK vs WHR
NEWELL BRANDS INC.
SWK vs NWL
Snap-on Inc
SWK vs SNA
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
SWK vs ITW
PROCTER & GAMBLE Co
SWK vs PG
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO
SWK vs CL
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
SWK vs JNJ
KIMBERLY CLARK CORP
SWK vs KMB
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO INC /DE/
SWK vs CHD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SWK can sustain its 14.9% ROIC and defend its 14.4% operating margin despite weak revenue growth, then hold or selectively own it; otherwise, the P/E-based downside to $33.79 and the DCF range argue for caution because the current price already sits well above both valuation anchors.
SWK trades at a much higher P/E than UL, but the gap is less extreme on sales and EV-based multiples. The market is effectively paying for SWK’s higher profitability and ROIC, while the stated implied price of $33.79 versus the current $94.58 points to a large downside on the P/E framework.
Supporting Metrics
