Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SWK stock price vs SNA: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SNA's multiple
Needs SNA P/E.
Implied fair value · at SWK's multiple
Needs SWK P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Snap-on Inc · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
SMITH A O CORP
SWK vs AOS
WHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/
SWK vs WHR
NEWELL BRANDS INC.
SWK vs NWL
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
SWK vs ITW
Trane Technologies plc
SWK vs TT
IDEX CORP /DE/
SWK vs IEX
SPX Technologies, Inc.
SWK vs SPXC
Xylem Inc.
SWK vs XYL
DOVER Corp
SWK vs DOV
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
SWK vs IR
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SWK can re-accelerate growth and expand margins toward SNA’s level, then hold or add selectively because the current valuation may be less punitive on sales-based multiples; otherwise, the data support underweighting SWK because its profitability and leverage profile do not justify the current $103.27 price relative to the $57.84 implied value.
SWK trades at 39.0x P/E versus SNA at 21.8x, even though SWK has materially weaker profitability and leverage. The provided implied price of $57.84 implies 44.0% downside from the current $103.27, while SWK also sits near the upper end of its historical band.
Supporting Metrics
