Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SWK stock price vs NWL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NWL's multiple
Needs NWL P/E.
Implied fair value · at SWK's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, SWK P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
14 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
NEWELL BRANDS INC · implied price per share
Bear
-$9.19
Base
-$9.00
Bull
-$8.67
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
SMITH A O CORP
SWK vs AOS
WHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/
SWK vs WHR
Snap-on Inc
SWK vs SNA
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
SWK vs ITW
PROCTER & GAMBLE Co
SWK vs PG
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO
SWK vs CL
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
SWK vs IBM
CLOROX CO /DE/
SWK vs CLX
ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES INC
SWK vs EL
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SWK can sustain its 14.4% operating margin and 14.9% ROIC while avoiding a further revenue slump, then owning SWK makes sense because its fundamentals are far stronger than NWL’s despite the valuation model showing downside to NWL-implied price.
SWK is trading at $94.58 versus a NWL-implied price of $32.30, which reflects a -65.8% downside to that specific P/S-based estimate. The gap appears driven more by the valuation framework and NWL’s weak fundamentals than by SWK’s operating profile, since SWK is already above NWL implied range and also within its historical band.
Supporting Metrics
