Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SNOW stock price vs NOW: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NOW's multiple
Needs NOW P/S.
Implied fair value · at SNOW's multiple
Needs Revenue / share, SNOW P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
SNOWFLAKE INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
SERVICENOW, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Datadog, Inc.
SNOW vs DDOG
MongoDB, Inc.
SNOW vs MDB
Palantir Technologies Inc.
SNOW vs PLTR
Elastic N.V.
SNOW vs ESTC
MICROSOFT CORP
SNOW vs MSFT
ADOBE INC.
SNOW vs ADBE
ORACLE CORP
SNOW vs ORCL
Salesforce, Inc.
SNOW vs CRM
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
SNOW vs IBM
Paycom Software, Inc.
SNOW vs PAYC
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SNOW can sustain 25%+ revenue growth while rapidly closing the profitability gap toward NOW's margin profile, then holding or buying may be justified because the current market price still reflects a large premium to NOW-implied value; otherwise, the valuation looks difficult to defend versus NOW's much stronger earnings power.
SNOW trades at a wide premium to NOW-implied value of $123.80, implying -61.1% downside from the current price of $318.00. The gap is driven by SNOW's much richer sales multiple versus NOW and its lack of earnings/EBITDA profitability.
Supporting Metrics
