Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SNOW stock price vs MSFT: inconclusive — current versus $143.69 implied using P/S multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Implied fair value · at SNOW's multiple
Needs SNOW P/S.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
SNOWFLAKE INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MICROSOFT CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Datadog, Inc.
SNOW vs DDOG
MongoDB, Inc.
SNOW vs MDB
Palantir Technologies Inc.
SNOW vs PLTR
Elastic N.V.
SNOW vs ESTC
Apple Inc.
SNOW vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
SNOW vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
SNOW vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
SNOW vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
SNOW vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
SNOW vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SNOW can convert its 29.2% revenue growth into sustained positive operating margins and ROIC improvement, then hold or add; otherwise, the MSFT-relative valuation gap and SNOW’s -30.6% operating margin argue for caution because the current price embeds a growth-to-profitability re-rating that the data does not yet support.
SNOW’s current price of $330.49 sits well above MSFT-implied price of $151.59, implying -54.1% downside versus MSFT-based valuation. The gap is driven by SNOW trading at a much richer sales multiple despite weaker earnings power and returns.
Supporting Metrics
