Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: SNOW stock price vs PAYC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PAYC's multiple
Needs PAYC P/S.
Implied fair value · at SNOW's multiple
Needs SNOW P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
SNOWFLAKE INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Paycom Software, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Datadog, Inc.
SNOW vs DDOG
MongoDB, Inc.
SNOW vs MDB
Palantir Technologies Inc.
SNOW vs PLTR
Elastic N.V.
SNOW vs ESTC
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC
SNOW vs ADP
PAYCHEX INC
SNOW vs PAYX
INTUIT INC.
SNOW vs INTU
Autodesk, Inc.
SNOW vs ADSK
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC
SNOW vs TYL
Salesforce, Inc.
SNOW vs CRM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe SNOW can materially improve operating margins and sustain 20%+ growth, then hold or buy on weakness; otherwise, the current valuation looks difficult to justify versus PAYC because SNOW trades at far richer sales multiples despite much weaker profitability and ROIC.
At $309.29, SNOW trades far above PAYC-implied price of $52.81, implying 82.9% downside on the provided P/S framework. The gap is driven by SNOW’s much richer valuation multiples versus PAYC, especially its 22.9x P/S and 23.0x EV/Revenue compared with PAYC’s 3.9x and 3.7x.
Supporting Metrics
