Netflix Inc
$331.31B- Market cap
- $325.91B
- Debt
- +$14.46B
- Cash
- −$9.06B
Capital structure 96% equity / 4% debt · EV / Revenue 7.33x · EV / EBITDA 24.65x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt capMarket cap $325.91B · View financials
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
FY 2026 · Mkt cap
Decision snapshot: NFLX stock price vs CTAS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CTAS's multiple
Needs CTAS P/E.
Implied fair value · at NFLX's multiple
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Multiple premium
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: NFLX FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · CTAS FY 2026 (ended May 31, 2026). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
11 fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 96% equity / 4% debt · EV / Revenue 7.33x · EV / EBITDA 24.65x
Capital structure 97% equity / 3% debt · EV / Revenue 7.31x · EV / EBITDA 26.56x
NFLX carries the larger enterprise value at $331.31B against $82.38B; CTAS trades on the lower EV / Revenue multiple (7.31x vs 7.33x); NFLX on the lower EV / EBITDA (24.65x vs 26.56x).
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
NETFLIX INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Cintas Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
0.54x
0.47x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
0.40x
0.69x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$9.06B
$289.02M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
NFLX vs AAPL
AMAZON COM INC
NFLX vs AMZN
COMCAST CORP
NFLX vs CMCSA
Walt Disney Co
NFLX vs DIS
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
NFLX vs WBD
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
NFLX vs LYV
UNIFIRST CORP
NFLX vs UNF
ABM INDUSTRIES INC /DE/
NFLX vs ABM
Aramark
NFLX vs ARMK
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
NFLX vs GWW
INTUIT INC.
NFLX vs INTU
IRON MOUNTAIN INC
NFLX vs IRM
$14.46B
$2.43B
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe NFLX's strong growth and profitability deserve a premium but not a 352.3x P/E, then the stock looks more attractive than CTAS on EV-based metrics and could be worth owning for re-rating potential because NFLX is already cheaper on EV/EBITDA and EV/Revenue while showing better revenue growth, margins, and ROIC.
NFLX's implied price of $116.24 sits 57.7% above the current price of $73.69, with CTAS implied range of $84.87 to $121.16 suggesting meaningful upside if the market re-rates NFLX closer to CTAS framework. However, the comparison is conflicted because NFLX looks cheaper on EV/EBITDA and EV/Revenue, but far more expensive on P/E.
Supporting Metrics