Microsoft Corporation
$3.68T- Market cap
- $3.71T
- Debt
- +$49.52B
- Cash
- −$76.84B
Capital structure 99% equity / 1% debt · EV / Revenue 11.10x · EV / EBITDA 17.97x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt cap
Decision snapshot: MSFT stock price vs XYZ: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at XYZ's multiple
Needs XYZ P/E.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Multiple premium
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: MSFT FY 2026 (ended Jun 30, 2026) · XYZ FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 99% equity / 1% debt · EV / Revenue 11.10x · EV / EBITDA 17.97x
Capital structure 74% equity / 26% debt · EV / Revenue 2.48x · EV / EBITDA 26.61x
MSFT carries the larger enterprise value at $3.68T against $59.88B; XYZ trades on the lower EV / Revenue multiple (2.48x vs 11.10x); MSFT on the lower EV / EBITDA (17.97x vs 26.61x).
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Block, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
0.11x
0.76x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-0.13x
4.63x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$76.84B
$6.56B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
MSFT vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
MSFT vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
MSFT vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
MSFT vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
MSFT vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
MSFT vs CSCO
INTUIT INC.
MSFT vs INTU
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
MSFT vs PYPL
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
MSFT vs FOUR
FISERV INC
MSFT vs FI
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC
MSFT vs GPN
WEX Inc.
MSFT vs WEX
$49.52B
$16.98B
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MSFT can sustain its 17.8% revenue growth and 46.8% operating margin, then prefer MSFT over XYZ because MSFT combines much stronger fundamentals with a lower P/E and superior ROIC, even though its P/S valuation is rich.
MSFT is valued above XYZ on a P/E basis versus 26.9x for MSFT and 38.7x for XYZ, while also carrying a much higher P/S multiple at 10.4x versus 2.1x for XYZ. The implied price of $694.41 suggests 49.4% upside from the current price of $464.72, but the valuation picture is mixed because XYZ is cheaper on revenue but more expensive on earnings.
Supporting Metrics