Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: MSFT stock price vs PYPL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PYPL's multiple
Needs PYPL P/E.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MICROSOFT CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
PayPal Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
MSFT vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
MSFT vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
MSFT vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
MSFT vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
MSFT vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
MSFT vs CSCO
VISA INC.
MSFT vs V
Mastercard Inc
MSFT vs MA
Block, Inc.
MSFT vs XYZ
AMERICAN EXPRESS CO
MSFT vs AXP
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC
MSFT vs MKTX
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC
MSFT vs FDS
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe MSFT can sustain its 17.8% revenue growth and 46.8% operating margin, then hold only if you are underwriting continued premium multiples; otherwise reduce exposure because PYPL-based implied price of $192.01 is 60.6% below the current price.
MSFT trades at a large premium to PYPL on earnings, sales, and cash-flow proxies, which is why PYPL-based implied price is only $192.01 versus a current price of $487.65. The gap is driven by MSFT’s much higher quality profile, but the valuation spread is still extreme relative to PYPL.
Supporting Metrics
