Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: META stock price vs SHOP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SHOP's multiple
Needs SHOP P/E.
Implied fair value · at META's multiple
Needs Annual EPS.
Metric by metric
Price unavailable
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: META FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · SHOP FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025).
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Meta Platforms, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Shopify Inc. · implied price per share
The ordinary-share to listed-security ratio could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
0.27x
-0.02x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-0.22x
-3.90x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$81.59B
$5.78B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
$58.74B
-$228.00M
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe META can sustain its 22.2% revenue growth while maintaining its 41.4% operating margin, then META looks attractive versus SHOP because it is far cheaper on P/E and dramatically stronger on profitability and ROIC.
META trades at 28.1x P/E versus SHOP at 115.6x, making META the much cheaper name on earnings. The model also shows a huge implied upside to $2,714.34 versus the current $591.51 price, but this appears driven by the relative multiple setup rather than a full fundamental re-rating.
Supporting Metrics
