Meta Platforms, Inc.
$1.54T- Market cap
- $1.57T
- Debt
- +$58.74B
- Cash
- −$81.59B
Capital structure 96% equity / 4% debt · EV / Revenue 7.68x · EV / EBITDA 14.66x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt cap
Decision snapshot: META stock price at premium vs SNAP $616.77 current versus $126.87 implied using P/S multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SNAP's multiple
Implied fair value · at META's multiple
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Multiple premium
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: META FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · SNAP FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025).
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 96% equity / 4% debt · EV / Revenue 7.68x · EV / EBITDA 14.66x
Capital structure 72% equity / 28% debt · EV / Revenue 1.70x
META carries the larger enterprise value at $1.54T against $10.08B; SNAP trades on the lower EV / Revenue multiple (1.70x vs 7.68x).
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Meta Platforms, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$304.64
Base
$371.86
Bull
$424.13
SNAP INC · implied price per share
Bear
$1.67
Base
$2.03
Bull
$2.50
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
0.27x
1.57x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-0.22x
-1.89x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$81.59B
$2.94B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
$58.74B
$3.58B
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe META’s current growth and 40%+ operating economics can persist, then favor holding or accumulating META rather than using SNAP as a valuation anchor, because META’s profitability and ROIC are vastly stronger and justify a premium multiple.
On a P/S basis, META’s 7.0x multiple is far above SNAP’s 1.4x, which mechanically produces the large SNAP-implied downside shown here. However, that comparison ignores the very different earnings power and capital efficiency profiles of the two businesses.
Supporting Metrics