Meta Platforms, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$35.87B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: META stock price at discount vs NVDA $660.09 current versus $894.06 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NVDA's multiple
Implied fair value · at META's multiple
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Lower P/E
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 100% equity / 0% debt · EV / Revenue 20.80x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 33.72x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Meta Platforms, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
NVIDIA CORP · implied price per share
Bear
$43.09
Base
$52.57
Bull
$59.95
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
META vs AAPL
AMAZON COM INC
META vs AMZN
Alphabet Inc.
META vs GOOGL
MICROSOFT CORP
META vs MSFT
Snap Inc
META vs SNAP
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
META vs AMD
INTEL CORP
META vs INTC
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
META vs TXN
Broadcom Inc.
META vs AVGO
QUALCOMM INC/DE
META vs QCOM
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC
META vs MCHP
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe META can sustain 20%+ revenue growth while closing some of the profitability gap only modestly, then consider META as a relative value holding versus NVDA because META already trades at meaningfully lower multiples across earnings and sales.
META trades at a large valuation discount to NVDA across P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue despite still strong absolute profitability. The gap is mainly explained by NVDA’s materially higher growth and margin profile, not by a clearly weaker balance sheet for META.
Supporting Metrics