Meta Platforms, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$35.87B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: META stock price near parity vs PSA $660.09 current versus $768.05 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PSA's multiple
Implied fair value · at META's multiple
Snapshot Sep 9, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Lower P/E
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
16 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Meta Platforms, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Public Storage · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
META vs AAPL
AMAZON COM INC
META vs AMZN
NVIDIA CORP
META vs NVDA
Alphabet Inc.
META vs GOOGL
MICROSOFT CORP
META vs MSFT
Snap Inc
META vs SNAP
National Storage Affiliates Trust
META vs NSA
Prologis, Inc.
META vs PLD
WEYERHAEUSER CO
META vs WY
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
META vs CSGP
WELLTOWER INC.
META vs WELL
UDR, Inc.
META vs UDR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe META’s high growth and ROIC can persist, then META looks undervalued versus PSA and PSA-implied valuation suggests meaningful upside, because META trades at lower earnings and sales multiples despite materially stronger fundamentals.
META trades at a current price of $556.71 versus a P/E-implied value of $845.14, implying 51.8% upside. That valuation gap is supported by META’s stronger growth and capital efficiency, even though PSA appears cheaper on some EV-based multiples.
Supporting Metrics