Meta Platforms, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$35.87B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt capMarket cap $1.10T · View financials
Decision snapshot: META stock price at discount vs AVGO $653.69 current versus $1.14K implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AVGO's multiple
Implied fair value · at META's multiple
Close Dec 31, 2024
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Lower P/E
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Meta Platforms, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Broadcom Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
META vs AAPL
AMAZON COM INC
META vs AMZN
NVIDIA CORP
META vs NVDA
Alphabet Inc.
META vs GOOGL
MICROSOFT CORP
META vs MSFT
Snap Inc
META vs SNAP
Intel Corporation
META vs INTC
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
META vs AMD
QUALCOMM Incorporated
META vs QCOM
Cisco Systems, Inc.
META vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe META can sustain its high ROIC while closing the gap with AVGO on EBITDA and net margins, then accumulating META makes sense because it trades at materially lower P/E, P/S, and EV/Revenue multiples despite stronger capital efficiency and lower leverage.
META trades at a clear discount to AVGO on both earnings and sales multiples, suggesting the market assigns a much lower revenue-quality premium to META. However, META's current price already sits near the top of its historical band, while AVGO-implied valuation framework points to a much higher theoretical value that may not be fully comparable given the large multiple divergence.
Supporting Metrics