Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: META stock price vs MKSI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MKSI's multiple
Needs MKSI P/E.
Implied fair value · at META's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Meta Platforms, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MKS INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$12.57
Base
$24.69
Bull
$40.47
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
META vs AAPL
AMAZON COM INC
META vs AMZN
NVIDIA CORP
META vs NVDA
Alphabet Inc.
META vs GOOGL
MICROSOFT CORP
META vs MSFT
Snap Inc
META vs SNAP
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
META vs KEYS
Fortive Corp
META vs FTV
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC
META vs TDY
METTLER TOLEDO INTERNATIONAL INC/
META vs MTD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe META’s superior margins, ROIC, and balance-sheet strength should justify a higher relative earnings multiple than MKSI, then lean bullish on META because the operational gap is large and the current price remains below the historical band; if you are more skeptical of MKSI-implied P/E framework, then stay neutral because valuation support is mixed across P/E, P/S, EV/Revenue, and DCF ranges.
On a MKSI-implied P/E basis, META’s model value of $1,911.94 implies 237.2% upside versus the current price of $566.98, which suggests the market is assigning a much lower earnings multiple than MKSI comparison framework. However, MKSI comparison is somewhat distorted because MKSI itself trades at a much higher P/E than META, while META is also below its historical band and well above the DCF range.
Supporting Metrics
