Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HD stock price vs TT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TT's multiple
Needs TT P/E.
Implied fair value · at HD's multiple
Needs HD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
The Home Depot, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$86.60
Base
$109.07
Bull
$140.31
TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC · implied price per share
Bear
$125.61
Base
$149.98
Bull
$181.70
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LOWES COMPANIES INC
HD vs LOW
FASTENAL CO
HD vs FAST
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
HD vs GWW
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.
HD vs SWK
WHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/
HD vs WHR
TRACTOR SUPPLY CO /DE/
HD vs TSCO
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
HD vs HON
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC
HD vs LII
Johnson Controls International plc
HD vs JCI
Walt Disney Co
HD vs DIS
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
HD vs EMR
SPX Technologies, Inc.
HD vs SPXC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HD can sustain its current margins and defend ROIC while closing some of the growth gap versus TT, then HD looks attractive versus TT-implied valuation because it trades at lower P/E and P/S multiples; if not, the cheaper valuation may be justified by slower growth and higher leverage.
HD trades well below the TT-implied value, with current price $331.96 versus implied price of $498.76, implying 50.2% upside on TT multiple framework. The gap is driven by HD’s lower valuation multiples versus TT, but the market is paying up for TT’s higher growth and stronger margin profile.
Supporting Metrics
