Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EXPD stock price vs LYFT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LYFT's multiple
Needs LYFT P/E.
Implied fair value · at EXPD's multiple
Needs EXPD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
13 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Lyft, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
EXPD vs CHRW
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
EXPD vs JBHT
FEDEX CORP
EXPD vs FDX
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
EXPD vs UPS
Uber Technologies, Inc
EXPD vs UBER
Airbnb, Inc.
EXPD vs ABNB
Booking Holdings Inc.
EXPD vs BKNG
DoorDash, Inc.
EXPD vs DASH
Grab Holdings Ltd
EXPD vs GRAB
TaskUs, Inc.
EXPD vs TASK
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EXPD can sustain its 9.5% operating margin and 42.0% ROIC while the market continues to reward quality over the lower DCF range, then hold or accumulate selectively; if you rely more on the provided implied price and DCF outputs, then reduce exposure because the current price embeds a large valuation premium.
On the provided numbers, EXPD trades at $178.71 versus an implied price of $15.26 from the P/E-based valuation, suggesting a very large downside gap of -91.5%. The gap is driven by a rich absolute multiple for EXPD relative to LYFT set context, despite EXPD’s stronger operating profile.
Supporting Metrics
