Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EXPD stock price vs DASH: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at DASH's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, DASH P/E.
Implied fair value · at EXPD's multiple
Needs EXPD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON INC · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
DOORDASH, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
EXPD · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
EXPD vs CHRW
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
EXPD vs JBHT
FEDEX CORP
EXPD vs FDX
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
EXPD vs UPS
Uber Technologies, Inc.
EXPD vs UBER
Amazon.com, Inc.
EXPD vs AMZN
YELP INC
EXPD vs YELP
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
EXPD vs DPZ
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
EXPD vs CMG
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EXPD can sustain its high ROIC and margin profile without needing DASH-like growth, then avoid using DASH-implied upside at face value because the current multiple already embeds a premium versus EXPD’s DCF range and the growth gap remains large.
EXPD trades at a steep discount to DASH across earnings, sales, and enterprise-value multiples, which explains the large implied upside from DASH P/E framework. However, the gap is heavily influenced by DASH's much higher growth rate and richer market multiple, so the comparison is not purely apples-to-apples.
Supporting Metrics
