Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: DLR stock price vs MMS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MMS's multiple
Needs MMS P/E.
Implied fair value · at DLR's multiple
Needs DLR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Maximus, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
EQUINIX INC
DLR vs EQIX
IRON MOUNTAIN INC
DLR vs IRM
Prologis, Inc.
DLR vs PLD
Public Storage
DLR vs PSA
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC
DLR vs AVB
SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
DLR vs SBAC
Accenture plc
DLR vs ACN
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
DLR vs IBM
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC /DE/
DLR vs CACI
ROLLINS INC
DLR vs ROL
CINTAS CORP
DLR vs CTAS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe DLR can sustain its historical trading band and justify a premium multiple despite a 53.4x P/E, then hold or selectively add; otherwise, reduce exposure because the stock screens expensive versus MMS, the DCF range, and MMS-implied valuation.
DLR’s current price of $191.22 is far above the implied P/E-based value of $40.42, implying -78.9% downside under that framework. The premium is also visible versus MMS on nearly every valuation multiple, even though DLR’s growth and margins are better in several areas.
Supporting Metrics
