Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CMG stock price vs TAP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TAP's multiple
Needs TAP P/E.
Implied fair value · at CMG's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, CMG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Molson Coors Beverage Company · implied price per share
Bear
$30.57
Base
$38.66
Bull
$51.58
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MCDONALDS CORP
CMG vs MCD
STARBUCKS CORP
CMG vs SBUX
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
CMG vs UPS
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
CMG vs DPZ
Wendy's Co
CMG vs WEN
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
CMG vs DRI
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.
CMG vs STZ
BOSTON BEER CO INC
CMG vs SAM
BROWN FORMAN CORP
CMG vs BF-A
Monster Beverage Corp
CMG vs MNST
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CMG can sustain positive mid-single-digit revenue growth and high-30s ROIC, then CMG looks better positioned than TAP and should be held or accumulated because the operating data support a premium multiple despite the model’s low implied price.
The stated P/S-based implied price of $5.81 versus the current price of $37.22 implies an 84.4% downside, which is an extreme gap relative to CMG’s operating quality. However, the comparison set is distorted because TAP has negative earnings and negative EBITDA, making earnings-based multiples less meaningful and heavily depressing relative valuation outputs.
Supporting Metrics
