Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CMG stock price vs MNST: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MNST's multiple
Needs MNST P/E.
Implied fair value · at CMG's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, CMG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Monster Beverage Corp · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MCDONALDS CORP
CMG vs MCD
STARBUCKS CORP
CMG vs SBUX
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
CMG vs UPS
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
CMG vs DPZ
Wendy's Co
CMG vs WEN
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
CMG vs DRI
COCA COLA CO
CMG vs KO
PEPSICO INC
CMG vs PEP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
CMG vs KDP
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP
CMG vs FIZZ
MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO
CMG vs TAP
BROWN FORMAN CORP
CMG vs BF-A
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CMG can close part of the valuation gap without needing MNST-like margins or growth, then CMG is worth holding or accumulating because it already trades at a large discount on P/E, P/S, and EV multiples versus MNST.
CMG trades at materially lower valuation multiples than MNST across P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, which suggests the market is assigning a clear discount to CMG. However, the discount is partly offset by MNST’s stronger margin profile and faster revenue growth, so the gap looks justified rather than obviously mispriced.
Supporting Metrics
