Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: XYZ stock price vs NXPI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NXPI's multiple
Needs NXPI P/E.
Implied fair value · at XYZ's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, XYZ P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Block, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
NXP Semiconductors N.V. · implied price per share
The ordinary-share to listed-security ratio could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
INTUIT INC.
XYZ vs INTU
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
XYZ vs PYPL
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
XYZ vs FOUR
FISERV INC
XYZ vs FI
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC
XYZ vs GPN
WEX Inc.
XYZ vs WEX
Qualcomm Incorporated
XYZ vs QCOM
Broadcom Inc.
XYZ vs AVGO
Texas Instruments Incorporated
XYZ vs TXN
NVIDIA Corporation
XYZ vs NVDA
Intel Corporation
XYZ vs INTC
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe XYZ can substantially improve margins and returns toward NXPI-like levels, then hold or accumulate only on weakness; otherwise, the current price looks rich because XYZ trades at a higher P/E than NXPI despite materially weaker profitability and a -25.5% implied downside.
XYZ trades at 38.7x P/E versus NXPI at 28.8x despite lower quality on margins and returns, which suggests the market is paying a premium for a weaker fundamental profile. The stock also sits above the upper end of the historical band and far above the DCF range, reinforcing downside risk rather than valuation support.
Supporting Metrics
