Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: XYZ stock price vs PYPL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PYPL's multiple
Needs PYPL P/E.
Implied fair value · at XYZ's multiple
Needs XYZ P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Block, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
PayPal Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
INTUIT INC.
XYZ vs INTU
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
XYZ vs FOUR
FISERV INC
XYZ vs FI
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC
XYZ vs GPN
WEX Inc.
XYZ vs WEX
VISA INC.
XYZ vs V
Mastercard Inc
XYZ vs MA
AMERICAN EXPRESS CO
XYZ vs AXP
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC
XYZ vs MKTX
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC
XYZ vs FDS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe XYZ can reaccelerate growth and convert its higher gross margin into materially better operating margin and ROIC, then hold or accumulate; otherwise, the current premium looks hard to justify versus PYPL because the valuation gap is large and the DCF/PYPL ranges point far below $69.52.
XYZ’s current price of $69.52 is far above both PYPL-implied range and the DCF range, suggesting the market is pricing in a much stronger outlook than the comparison set supports. On a P/E basis, XYZ screens expensive at 33.1x versus PYPL at 7.7x, while P/S and EV/Revenue are also above PYPL, indicating the premium is broad-based rather than isolated to one metric.
Supporting Metrics
