Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
XYZ stock price vs KR: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | XYZ | KR | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) XYZ: FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | KR: FY 2025 -> FY 2026 | 0.3% | 0.4% | KR leads by 14.6% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 42.8% | 51.6% | KR leads by 17.0% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 9.7% | 2.0% | XYZ leads by 395.5% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | -1.0 | 4.8 | XYZ leads by 121.7% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | XYZ | Delta vs KR | KR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.19B | 83.6% lower | $147.64B |
| Gross profit | $10.36B | 86.4% lower | $76.15B |
| Operating income | $1.71B | 9.6% lower | $1.89B |
| EBITDA | $2.34B | 18.8% lower | $2.88B |
| Net income | $1.31B | 28.5% higher | $1.02B |
| EPS | 2.1 | 36.4% higher | 1.5 |
| Revenue growth | 0.3% | 14.6% lower | 0.4% |
| Gross margin | 42.8% | 17.0% lower | 51.6% |
| Operating margin | 7.1% | 451.6% higher | 1.3% |
| EBITDA margin | 9.7% | 395.5% higher | 2.0% |
| Net margin | 5.4% | 684.2% higher | 0.7% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
XYZ looks expensive versus its DCF range but only modestly rich versus KR on earnings and materially stronger on profitability, leaving the valuation case mixed rather than clearly bullish or bearish.
If you believe XYZ can sustain its superior margin profile and cleaner balance sheet despite flat growth, then hold or accumulate on weakness because the current premium versus KR is supported more by profitability and leverage quality than by growth.
XYZ’s implied price of $78.74 is 3.1% below its current price of $81.24, indicating only a small near-term downside on the stated P/E basis. The broader picture is mixed because XYZ trades at 38.7x P/E versus KR at 37.5x, but at much higher P/S and EV/Revenue multiples that suggest the market pays up for XYZ’s stronger margins.
Supporting Metrics