Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: WEN stock price vs EAT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at EAT's multiple
Needs EAT P/E.
Implied fair value · at WEN's multiple
Needs WEN P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Wendy's Co · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$106.35
Base
$126.42
Bull
$152.55
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MCDONALDS CORP
WEN vs MCD
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC
WEN vs CMG
Shake Shack Inc.
WEN vs SHAK
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
WEN vs DRI
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
WEN vs DPZ
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
WEN vs BLMN
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
WEN vs CBRL
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
WEN vs PLAY
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe WEN can reaccelerate revenue growth and reduce leverage without eroding margins, then the stock could be attractive because it trades below EAT-implied range and on lower earnings multiples; otherwise, the current discount looks warranted given -3.1% revenue growth, a 4.4x Net Debt/EBITDA ratio, and a 1.04 Altman Z-Score.
WEN trades at 9.1x P/E versus EAT at 17.1x and 7.0x EV/EBITDA versus 8.5x, indicating a clear valuation discount on earnings-based multiples. However, WEN also has a lower growth profile and far weaker balance-sheet metrics, which likely explains much of the gap.
Supporting Metrics
