Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: WEN stock price vs BLMN: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BLMN's multiple
Needs BLMN P/E.
Implied fair value · at WEN's multiple
Needs WEN P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Wendy's Co · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MCDONALDS CORP
WEN vs MCD
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC
WEN vs CMG
Shake Shack Inc.
WEN vs SHAK
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
WEN vs DRI
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
WEN vs DPZ
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC
WEN vs EAT
CHEESECAKE FACTORY INC
WEN vs CAKE
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
WEN vs TXRH
BJs RESTAURANTS INC
WEN vs BJRI
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
WEN vs CBRL
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe WEN can stabilize revenue and preserve its 15.8% operating margin while managing 4.4x net debt/EBITDA, then WEN looks more attractive than BLMN on relative fundamentals because its earnings base and ROIC are much stronger despite the balance-sheet risk.
The valuation gap is extreme on P/E: WEN trades at 8.7x versus BLMN at 86.6x, which mechanically produces the very high implied price for WEN. On sales and cash flow proxies, the picture is less one-sided because WEN is richer on P/S at 0.6x versus 0.2x and both names have EV/EBITDA of 6.9x, suggesting the market is discounting WEN's better earnings power but not assigning it a deep absolute discount.
Supporting Metrics
