Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: VNO stock price vs JBGS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at JBGS's multiple
Needs JBGS P/E.
Implied fair value · at VNO's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, VNO P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Vornado Realty Trust · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
JBG SMITH PROPERTIES · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.
VNO vs ESRT
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
VNO vs CSGP
WELLTOWER INC.
VNO vs WELL
UDR, Inc.
VNO vs UDR
SL GREEN REALTY CORP
VNO vs SLG
Prologis, Inc.
VNO vs PLD
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC
VNO vs AVB
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
VNO vs ESS
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
VNO vs CPT
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe VNO’s superior margins, profitability, and lower leverage deserve a premium that can persist, then holding or selectively accumulating on weakness is reasonable because VNO’s fundamentals are much stronger than JBGS even though JBGS-based valuation still points below the current price.
VNO trades at $39.93 versus a JBGS-implied price of $15.95, implying -60.1% downside on the provided P/S-based comparison. That discount is driven by JBGS’s weaker operating profile, but VNO still prices above its historical band and sits well above JBGS-implied range.
Supporting Metrics
