Vornado Realty Trust
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$840.85M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: VNO stock price vs UDR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at UDR's multiple
Needs UDR P/E.
Implied fair value · at VNO's multiple
Needs VNO P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Vornado Realty Trust · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
UDR, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.
VNO vs ESRT
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
VNO vs CSGP
WELLTOWER INC.
VNO vs WELL
SL GREEN REALTY CORP
VNO vs SLG
Prologis, Inc.
VNO vs PLD
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
VNO vs EQR
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC
VNO vs AVB
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
VNO vs CPT
MID AMERICA APARTMENT COMMUNITIES INC.
VNO vs MAA
APARTMENT INVESTMENT & MANAGEMENT CO
VNO vs AIV
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe VNO’s stronger profitability and much lower leverage are sustainable and that the market will narrow the valuation gap toward UDR-like multiples, then VNO looks attractive versus UDR because it is cheaper on every major multiple and has better balance-sheet support.
VNO trades at a large discount to UDR across earnings and asset multiples, with a P/E of 9.4x versus 33.8x, EV/EBITDA of 6.7x versus 24.0x, and P/S of 4.1x versus 7.2x. The current price of $39.39 sits near the top of VNO’s historical band but still below the DCF range and well under UDR-implied price range.
Supporting Metrics