Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TXT stock price vs GD: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at GD's multiple
Needs GD P/E.
Implied fair value · at TXT's multiple
Needs TXT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
TEXTRON INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION · implied price per share
Bear
$153.15
Base
$183.87
Bull
$223.89
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TXT can sustain its 8.0% revenue growth while reducing leverage from 1.2x Debt/Equity and 5.2x Net Debt/EBITDA toward GD-like levels, then TXT looks attractive relative to GD because it already trades at a clear discount on P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA.
TXT trades at a clear discount to GD on both absolute and implied valuation metrics, with GD-based model implying meaningful upside to $129.67 versus a current price of $89.43. However, the discount must be weighed against TXT’s weaker leverage profile and lower net margin, which help explain why the market does not award it GD-like multiples.
Supporting Metrics
