Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
TXT stock price vs DE: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Latest stored price
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | TXT | DE | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) TXT: FY 2024 -> FY 2026 | DE: FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | 8.0% | -11.7% | TXT leads by 168.6% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 31.8% | 13.7% | TXT leads by 132.1% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 11.0% | 30.0% | DE leads by 63.4% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | 5.2 | 2.7 | DE leads by 91.6% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | TXT | Delta vs DE | DE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.80B | 67.6% lower | $45.68B |
| Gross profit | $4.71B | 24.8% lower | $6.26B |
| Operating income | — | N/A | $9.04B |
| EBITDA | $1.62B | 88.2% lower | $13.71B |
| Net income | $921.00M | 81.7% lower | $5.03B |
| EPS | 5.1 | 72.4% lower | 18.5 |
| Revenue growth | 8.0% | 168.6% higher | -11.7% |
| Gross margin | 31.8% | 132.1% higher | 13.7% |
| Operating margin | — | N/A | 19.8% |
| EBITDA margin | 11.0% | 63.4% lower | 30.0% |
| Net margin | 6.2% | 43.4% lower | 11.0% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
TXT screens cheap versus DE on P/E and P/S, but the case is tempered by weaker profitability, much higher leverage, and a DCF range that sits well below the current price.
If you believe TXT can sustain 8.0% revenue growth while improving margins and reducing 5.2x net debt/EBITDA, then TXT looks worth owning because it is cheaper than DE on P/E and P/S and trades within its historical band.
TXT trades at 18.1x P/E and 1.1x P/S versus DE at 33.6x P/E and 3.7x P/S, which makes TXT look materially cheaper on earnings and sales. However, TXTs EV/EBITDA of 15.1x is roughly in line with DE's 14.9x, suggesting the apparent discount is less dramatic on an enterprise-value basis.
Supporting Metrics