Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: TTWO stock price vs QCOM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at QCOM's multiple
Needs QCOM P/S.
Implied fair value · at TTWO's multiple
Needs TTWO P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. · implied price per share
At least 3 of the last 5 annual free-cash-flow observations must be positive.
QUALCOMM INC/DE · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
TTWO vs EA
Roblox Corp
TTWO vs RBLX
Unity Software Inc.
TTWO vs U
Skillz Inc.
TTWO vs SKLZ
PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.
TTWO vs MYPS
Broadcom Inc.
TTWO vs AVGO
INTEL CORP
TTWO vs INTC
NVIDIA CORP
TTWO vs NVDA
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
TTWO vs TXN
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
TTWO vs AMD
Qorvo, Inc.
TTWO vs QRVO
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe TTWO can sustain above-QCOM revenue growth while sharply improving operating margin from -1.6% toward QCOM-like profitability, then consider holding; otherwise, the data favors reducing exposure because TTWO trades at a premium valuation despite weaker earnings and far lower ROIC than QCOM.
TTWO trades at a substantial premium to QCOM-based implied price, with an implied downside of 41.0% versus the current price of $254.99. The valuation gap is reinforced by TTWO's richer sales and EBITDA multiples despite materially weaker earnings quality than QCOM.
Supporting Metrics
